"And as for regulating the press, let no man think to have the honour of advising ye better than yourselves have done in that order published next before this, 'that no book be printed, unless the printer's and the author's name, or at least the printer's, be registered.' "
Here he even suggests that due credit be given, but that no control be executed to keep information from certain groups or what have you. He thinks as I do that no man has that much authority over another that they can dictate what should or should not be viewed, heard or experienced. He goes on, as he concludes to point a finger at the government who are the first to cover their tracks. This is the case for any body, company, or organization that rules over another. Milton says this:
"This I know, that errors in a good government and in a bad are equally almost incident; for what magistrate may not be misinformed, and much the sooner, if liberty of printing be reduced to the power of a few?"
Here he's trying to get across even further that even in the case of the government, censorship shouldn't be tolerated, allowing a few to make the choice for the whole. A good example of this and how it applies today can be found in a re-airing of an episode of Saturday Night Live. It originally aired last March containing a biting skit that directly poked fun at the corporate ownership of TV networks. The bit is modeled after Schoolhouse Rock and its song lyrics are anything but child-like with phrases like:
"It's a media-opoly. A media-opoly The whole media's controlled by a few corporations Thanks to deregulation by the FCC"
"They can give you lots of cancer That can hurt your body But on network TV You'll rarely hear anything bad about the nuclear industry Like when Westinghouse was sued for fraud? Which time? When GE made defective bolts it was an unreported crime Or when it was boycotted for operating nuclear bomb plants just to squeeze a dime..."
"I hear GE made the bullets that shot JFK"
So it's no shock that when this whole episode re-aired in June, this cute little skit was mysteriously cut from the show, end of story. This is a prime example of a corporate giant censoring a skit that implies they control the media...I don't think Milton would like this sort of behavior, no matter what level it's on.
here's the link to the article about it. I'd include the link to the video of the skit, but would you believe I couldn't find it?
http://find.galegroup.com.candycorn.lipscomb.edu/ips/retrieve.do?contentSet=IAC-Documents&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&qrySerId=Locale%28en%2C%2C%29%3AFQE%3D%28ke%2CNone%2C19%29censoring+the+media%24&sgHitCountType=None&inPS=true&sort=DateDescend&searchType=BasicSearchForm&tabID=T003&prodId=IPS&searchId=R1¤tPosition=5&userGroupName=tel_a_beaman&docId=A20913887&docType=IAC&contentSet=IAC-Documents
All these are great quotes from the reading, but there is another one that really stuck out in mind. “Who kills a man kills a reasonable creature, God's image; but he who destroys a good book, kills reason itself, kills the image of God, as it were in the eye.” This language is very powerful, forcing me to think of how important it is for us to be able to share our thoughts.
ReplyDeleteThis quote also reminded me of one of my favorite quotes. “Where books are burned, in the end people will be burned.” Heinrich Heine wrote this about the burning of the Quran in the Spanish Inquisition; however, he predicted the future, too. His books were among the many that were burned by the Nazis during their raids, and we all know who the Nazis ended up burning.
This may be an extreme example, but censorship limits our ability to reason, that which makes us human. No human is capable of determining what another human can use to form their individual thoughts and beliefs.
I don't want to be overly pessimistic, but I think sensorship of ideas goes on a lot more in our country than many of us would care to know or admit. For example, much of what really happens in the foreign policy realm (Iraq, War on Terror, etc.) is kept from the public eye. Then voters who don't really know exactly what is going on are expected to cast informed votes and pick the best people to run our country. I'm not saying that the American people have to know every little detail about what goes on in our government, as this could jeopardize our safety. However, major sensorship of ideas not only dehumanizes us, it keeps us from making informed decisions. This applies to all areas of life, not just politics.
ReplyDelete