Obviously, Hitler's approach in this speech contrasts sharply with conventional Western political oration. But just how great is the difference? Has modern society outgrown its weakness for the type of speech in which the orator speaks so emphatically that, by the end, he is drenched in sweat and out of breath? Could it be that such a delivery is now taboo due to the nature of the historical figures who have employed such tactics?
Monday, February 2, 2009
The True Power of Communication: Then and Now
As we are all aware of and have touched on briefly in class, there are countless historical examples of great orators rising rapidly through the ranks to become powerful (often tyrannical) leaders. One of the most relevent modern examples is the rise of Adolf Hitler to power during the German economic depression. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KgJQUXr2Ws shows Hitler's passionate appeal to the German youth. Although the subtitles are at times impossible to read, listen to Hitler's voice and observe his gait while he communicates.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The differences between Hitler's speech and the speech of modern speakers may be more a function of culture and language than time. One can still listen to many African-American preachers whose cadences and stylistic gymnastics do not resonate outside of their own cultural subset. Current radio evangelists often appear out of breath as they proclaim the judgment of God against sinners. One can also imagine them sweating up a storm in the station from which they are broadcasting. I wonder what role television news and entertainment programs have played over the past four decades in establishing what constitutes correct speech?
ReplyDelete