Wednesday, February 11, 2009
The Lazy Generation
Monday, February 9, 2009
face-to-monitor-to-face communication
The video, almost laughably, describes the internet phenomena as if it were some horrible pandemic of disease. Facebook and Myspace, when used appropriately, are excellent social networking tools, rather than some ailment found on "House". However, as explored in the video, discretion seems to be the element we as a demographic lack. I know several people personally that have been targeted by internet “creepers”, but their experience has been because of their own poor judgment rather than because they were sought out. It’s common sense that if someone asks you to take a picture of yourself topless and put it on the internet, you don’t do it. For as many examples of internet misuse that PBS was able to find, there are dozens more counter-examples that disprove their theories.
The internet is not a simple fad. It is used daily by millions worldwide, creating easy commerce and linking people around the globe. What bothers me most is that the internet (as well as cell phones and instant messenger) eliminates the necessity for face-to-face communication. Using this class blog as a standard method of communication makes me wonder if the science-fiction farces in the movies are really all that far off. If our reliance is based on a simple data-transfer system (punctuated by the occasional emoticon if we so choose), we lose the real meaning of relationships. Even the Pope has condemned overuse of these internet networking tools!
It’s sort of funny, really, how quickly we have embraced Facebook and Myspace. For example; in my high school, unless your relationship was “Facebook-Official”, it didn’t exist. If you weren’t friends with a person on the internet, you clearly didn’t socialize with him or her in real life. It seems ridiculous that an internet site would dictate so many social interactions. In a perfect world, everyone would get along in social situations. We wouldn’t be so distracted by our technology. Still, to be perfectly honest, I have Facebook open just behind this blog post. My cell phone is going off on the table right next to me. I’m sitting in the student center with about twenty other kids, all of whom are glued to their monitors. We're all in our separate little internet worlds, though I bet you anything half of them are Facebookchatting each other. I’ve got to take my idealism with a grain of salt, I suppose.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/01/23/pope-warns-against-obsess_n_160283.html
http://mashable.com/2006/08/25/facebook-profile/
plus, I thought this was funny;
http://www.bittertonic.com/daily-dose/395/i-can-be-your-facebook-stalker/
www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Teen_Parents_data_memo_Oct2007.pdf
www.christian-education.org/downloads/InternetSafetyParents.pdf
www.oneplaneteducation.com/Internet_Safety_Guide.pdf
Teens and Online Bullying
Some teens go online to better express themselves. Some teens go online to escape reality.
However, some teens have their troubles follow them, even to their computer or cell phone. They can't escape the cruel remarks made in peson or online. Cyberbullying can take place through e-mail, text messages, instant messages, or any other form of digital communication. At school, students are protected from bullies. Teachers are on the lookout for bullies, and virtually every form of web communication is blocked at school. However, when teens come home and are alone in their rooms, there is no one there to protect them. Thankfully, this is beginning to change.
After Ryan's suicide, Vermont (his home state) began to propose ideas for laws that could prohibit all forms of cyberbullying. These new laws would place the school system in the middle of an bullying incident that might occur away from school grounds. The passing of such laws would determine if students can be punished for communication that goes on outside of school. To some, this may be an invasion of privacy. I believe that one child's suicide is more than enough, and laws or rules should be set to prevent this from happening again in the future.
http://www.vineland.org/tech/fight_bullies.pdf
As the documentary also states, however, parents generally have no cause for worry when it comes to internet predators. Because our generation is so internet-oriented, schools have recently begun to conduct more education regarding internet safety. One study shows that 82% of teenagers' instant message partners are close friends from school.1 Adolescents and teenagers generally know how to practice safe internet usage, and if a parent is concerned about his or her child's internet safety knowledge, he or she can talk to the child to share this information.
1http://www.cdmc.ucla.edu/downloads/Adolescent%20Internet%20usepdf.pdf <http://www.cdmc.ucla.edu/downloads/Adolescent%20Internet%20usepdf.pdf>
Sunday, February 8, 2009
The Assimilation of the Offline Generation
Perhaps the question that the “Growing Up Online” documentary didn’t cover is how the availability and popularity of the Internet, and perhaps more so the social networking sites (OSN for short), are effecting the previous generation. Since the documentary came out in early 2008, I’ve noticed a proliferation of adults on Facebook.
Some I’m sure are there in order to keep track of their children, as called spying by those who are being “kept track of”. Some adults though are now becoming fully integrated into the world of online social networking. They are finding old friends and making new ones and even using the plethora of applications available to them on the site. The Borg like spread of OSN has gotten to point that an Australian court has allowed sending a message on Facebook to be considered a way of serving legally binding documents1. Many companies are even going to Facebook and MySpace in order to research job applicants, and many of them are not liking what they find2.
Because of this generation’s interconnectedness with the Internet and technology as a whole, previous generations are being forced to learn things like what being “poked” means or how to type in texting jargon. Will the previous generations be able to keep up with this technology infused generation? How will that affect the “Online Generation”? Or will they simply, in the words of a fellow student’s Facebook status update, “realize that they will never understand Facebook”?
1) see http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/techpolicy/2008-12-16-australia-facebook_N.htm
2) see http://www.zdnetasia.com/techjobs/career-resources/0,3800009355,62050688,00.htm
And http://www.news-herald.com/articles/2009/02/06/news/nh453376.txt
Saturday, February 7, 2009
The Online Generation
The PBS Video Special “Growing up Online” was a very intriguing social analysis, but one must not overlook its biases. PBS does not have a historical reputation of being in-tune with adolescent culture, and this truth was rather apparent in the approach it took toward the “Online Generation.” Though the video contained a large amount of valid, often disturbing information about the manner in which online communication is molding the current generation, it assumed a somewhat patronizing view toward these “internet-addicted” teens—having them confess their deepest cyber-secrets and then including the opinion of the tragically deceived parents. The video did an excellent job of conveying the dangers that lurk in the unexplored frontiers of internet communication but failed to provide an adequately rounded assessment. In particular, PBS showed a clear cynicism on the nature of Facebook, which is now regarded by members of every generation as an indispensable communication tool.
According to Jamie Efaw’s article “Social Networking Services: the New Influence Frontier” which appeared in the academic journal American Diplomacy, Facebook (and social networking in general) is a great triumph for the Western world in what she calls “the War of Ideas”. Efaw asserts that the social mobility and minimal restriction of ideas, creativity, and communication manifest in applications like Facebook give the West a decisive advantage in both time and economic efficiency, two invaluable assets to an increasingly interconnected world. That brings us to this question: do the benefits we reap by the products of “Growing up Online” enumerated in Efaw’s article outweigh the potential social detriment PBS warns us of? Or is this cost-benefit approach not a proper way to evaluate the emerging dilemma?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/22/AR2008022202630.html